Selections from my work in educational leadership

Digital Badges and Microcredentials: Evaluating Existing Frameworks

Reviewing the Research

Exploring existing frameworks will help me to consider key elements for my own microcredential evaluation framework. I believe that digital badges should carry meaning that is easily recognizable by employers. To be forthcoming, I don’t think the current status of microcredentials reflects any kind of consistency in quality. For this reason, I am excited to develop my own evaluation method.

First, let’s look at some of the existing frameworks accessible online by some of the most popular, reputable platforms as well as government education agencies.

I should add that I have chosen to use the word “platform” to be more open in my thinking as I believe “vendor” is probably more appropriate based on my experience so far. As you may have seen in my earlier blog posts, finding free microcredentials for K-12 educators was a challenge for me. Most of the digital badges I found online were offered at a cost, sometimes very expensive, so microcredentialing is definitely a market.

For that reason, I believe evaluations by educational agencies may be more reliable. However, all existing frameworks can contribute valid criteria toward a standardized evaluation system.

Table 1. Collection of microcredential framework information available online from various reputable credentialing platforms.

In addition to the information provided in Table 1, I want to share a graphic (Figure 1) that I found interesting from the North Carolina plan. While this image doesn’t specifically lay out criteria for evaluation, I appreciate the description of a process for evaluation.

Microcredentials evaluation design
Figure 1. Microcredential evaluation design draft from the report Transforming Educator Learning in North Carolina: Realizing the Potential of Micro-credentials (McDiarmid et al., 2023).

Having spent some time with the resources here, my next step will be developing my own framework rubric. The literature that I reviewed has brought some areas to my attention, such as scalability, which I would have overlooked otherwise (Coyle, 2024), so I am grateful for having looked at some other examples of frameworks.

References

DigiLEARN. (2024). digiLEARN. https://www.digilearn.org/nc-partnership

Digital Promise. (2024). Micro-credentials. Digital Promise. https://microcredentials.digitalpromise.org/

Digital Promise. (2024). Micro-credentials. Digital Promise. https://digitalpromise.org/initiative/educator-micro-credentials/

McDiarmid, G., Berry, B., Barringer, M., North Carolina Partnership for Micro-Credentials Task Force, Best, M., McBride, A., & Tomberlin, T. (2023). Transforming educator learning in North Carolina: Realizing the potential of micro-credentials. North Carolina Partnership for Micro-Credentials Task Force. https://loriebell.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/06/3f35c-micro-credentials_report_final_2_2_23.pdf

North Carolina Partnership for Micro-Credentials. (2024). digiLEARN. https://www.digilearn.org/nc-partnership

Rehak, & Hickey. (2017). Digital badges: Principles for recognizing learning and badge face credibility for employers and colleges. https://www.michigan.gov/-/media/Project/Websites/mde/Year/2017/03/29/Digital_Badges_principles_and_standards_rubric_9212015.pdf?rev=0da3e9686b2449ba82536827a97dc7d3

Coyle, R. (2024, May 9). Increasing the value of digital credentials. EdTech Digest. https://www.edtechdigest.com/2024/05/09/increasing-the-value-of-digital-credentials/

Training and development providers. (2024). https://info.credly.com/solutions/training-and-development-providers


Discover more from Lorie Bell

Subscribe to get the latest posts sent to your email.

Leave a comment

Selections from my work in educational leadership